Showing posts with label Structured equity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Structured equity. Show all posts

Saturday 19 March 2016

Analyzing ConocoPhillips’ Return on Equity (COP, XOM)

ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) reported return on equity (ROE) of -2.04% for the 12-month period ending in September 2015. This represents a sharp drop from its 2014 ROE of 13.21% and an even bigger drop from its 2013 figure of 18.3%. The company has a trailing 12-month net loss of $1 billion, down sharply from a net income of $6.9 billion in 2014. Its shareholders' equity, which stood at $44.2 billion as of September 2015, has declined more modestly. It was $51.9 billion at year-end 2014.

ROE Analysis

ConcoPhillips' precipitous drop in ROE from 13.21% in 2014 to -2.04% for the 12-month period ending in September 2015 came as a result of a commensurately sharp decline in net income. Like all large-cap oil and gas companies, ConocoPhillips has struggled amid a crash in oil prices throughout 2015. Oil, which traded as high as $147 per barrel for a time in 2008, fell below $30 per barrel in 2015, its lowest price since the 1990s. The company's main competitors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM) and BP PLC (NYSE: BP), also saw their net incomes and ROE fall considerably from 2014 to 2015 -- though Exxon Mobil managed to keep both figures positive.

DuPont Analysis

A typical ROE analysis looks at net income and shareholders' equity separately and evaluates the effect that each has had on changes in ROE. The DuPont analysis, by contrast, breaks ROE into its constituent components of net margin, asset turnover ratio and equity multiplier and seeks to determine the influence each has on ROE.

ConocoPhillips' net margin for the 12-month period ending in September 2015 was -2.82%, down from 12.37% in 2014. A February 2016 press release from the company acknowledges that low commodity prices have squeezed its margins and, as a result, it is taking active steps to bring expenditures in line with its reduced revenue. It cut its quarterly dividend from 74 cents per share to 25 cents per share, lowered capital expenditures by $1.3 billion and reduced operating costs by $700 million.

Its competitors suffered falling margins as well, with Exxon Mobil's dropping from 7.89 to 6.73% and BP's declining from 1.05 to -3.06%. ConocoPhillips had the largest drop of the three, making it reassuring that the company has acknowledged the root of the problem and taken quick and decisive steps to address it.

ConocoPhillips' trailing 12-month asset turnover ratio is 0.32. This figure, which measures how efficiently a company generates revenue from its assets, has fallen steadily from 1.62 in 2011. Its influence on ROE appears moderate, though not as pronounced as that of net margin. Exxon Mobil and BP, both with asset turnover ratios of 0.85, have seen their asset turnovers slow down as well in the wake of the oil price collapse.

ConocoPhillips' equity multiplier for the 12-month period ending in September 2015 is 2.4. This figure has remained steady for a decade. While the company's equity position has fallen slightly, the company has also reduced its debt load, keeping the ratio between the two consistent. A silver lining for ConocoPhillips amid the oil collapse is, at least, the company is not overleveraged. Its equity multiplier sits squarely between those of Exxon Mobil (2.0) and BP (2.7).

Conclusions

ConocoPhillips' steep drop in ROE resulted from severe declines in net income and net margin, both symptoms of broader oil market malaise. On the bright side, the company has come forward with the steps it is taking to counter its declining revenue resulting from low oil prices, which involve slashing expenditures in several areas, such as dividends, capital expenditures and operating expenses. Every large-cap oil and gas company has suffered in the wake of the oil crash. Investors in ConocoPhillips should at least be comforted that the company is being proactive in responding to it.

Friday 18 March 2016

Govt clarifies safe harbour norms for offshore funds

Buyout firms will not benefit.
Reuters
rupee
The government has clarified the so-called ‘safe harbour’ norms for offshore funds in a move that benefits the private equity and venture capital industry.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), in a notification earlier this week, introduced a look-through provision to determine the number of investors in a fund to qualify for the safe harbour and stipulated 18 months’ time for new funds to satisfy the norms.
It said an approval committee that is being formed will determine the eligibility of the managers of offshore funds to avail safe harbour benefits. Those who want to avail such relaxations need to apply to this committee.
The notification makes it clear that the offshore funds that seek to control an Indian business cannot avail safe harbour benefits. For that purpose, it stipulates that funds which have more than 26 per cent voting rights in an Indian company will not be considered for safe harbour provisions.

This means that buyout firms won’t benefit from the government’s move. Also, many large PE deals involve over 26 per cent stake. So this may lead PE firms to make co-investments with limited partners or other PE firms.
While defining the safe harbour norms for an offshore fund, the rule that stipulates a minimum 25 investors has been redefined. A look-through provision has been brought in wherein the rule will be relaxed for funds that have institutional investors with a large number of investors/ limited partners.

"About 85 per cent of the $20 billion of VC/PE investments made in India in 2015 were made by offshore-based asset management companies. For most offshore funds, this move greatly eases doing business from a tax certainty perspective," said Gopal Srinivasan, chairman and managing director at TVS Capital and vice chairman of the Indian Venture Capital Association.

Subramaniam Krishnan, partner, tax and regulatory services, EY, said that while the provisions largely appeal to fund managers of public market-focused foreign institutional investors, PE and VC players will also benefit from these rules.
Industry executives say the government’s move will encourage many Indian fund managers of offshore funds, who were operating out of overseas locations such as Hong Kong and Singapore, to relocate to India.

“Directionally, the issuance of the guidelines by the government is an important step forward in enabling the regime for domestically managing foreign capital, something which countries like Singapore and the UK have done so well,” said Tejas Desai, tax partner for financial services at EY.

“The guidelines provide some important clarifications in relation to the qualifying conditions for the fund like the manner of determining resident Indian ownership and permitting a look-through approach in determining the number of investors in the fund,” he added.
According to Desai, the guidelines provide that the offshore fund can seek a prior confirmation of its eligibility by making an application to the CBDT, something which should give certainty of tax outcome for the fund. 

“Over the long run, this means more opportunities for Indian talent within both domestic and global asset management firms to play an expanded role in managing foreign capital,” 

You can use systematic transfer plans to invest in equity funds

An STP is recommended for transfers from a liquid scheme to an equity scheme, but you can mix and match your STP investments depending on your goals.



One of the ways to invest a lump sum amount in mutual funds is a systematic transfer plan (STP). In this, the money is systematically moved from a liquid fund to a systematic investment plan (SIP) of an equity fund of your choice.
WHAT IS AN STP?
This is a variant of an SIP—an investor invests a lump sum amount in one scheme, usually a low-risk fund (say, a short-term debt or liquid fund) and regularly transfers a pre-defined amount into another scheme, typically an equity fund, which is meant for long-term wealth creation.
The transfer can happen every month on a specified date (some fund houses offer weekly transfers as well). But do keep in mind that both the schemes have to be by the same fund house. For example, if you have a lump sum of Rs.1 lakh, you can invest this in a liquid fund and set up an STP of, say, Rs.5,000, which will gradually transfer your money into an equity fund of the same fund house.
An STP allows you to systematically invest a lump sum into an equity fund, but at the same time earn slightly higher returns on the uninvested portion that is in the liquid or short-term debt fund, instead of being in a savings account. According to Value Research, the average return of liquid funds in the past one-year period has been 7.89% as on 16 March 2016. In comparison, most savings accounts give 4% per annum (some may give 6-7%).
TYPES OF STPS
One of the types is fixed STP where a fixed sum is transferred from one scheme to the other. Then there is capital appreciation STP. However, only a few fund houses offer this. In this, only the returns are invested in the other scheme; the original lump sum stays in the liquid or short-term debt fund. For example, if Rs.10 lakh is invested in a liquid fund that gives a monthly return of Rs.10,000, then only Rs.10,000 will be transferred to an equity fund.
THINGS TO REMEMBER
An STP is recommended for transfers from a liquid scheme to an equity scheme, but you can mix and match your STP investments depending on your goals. For instance, you can put money in an ultra short-term debt fund or a short-term bond fund and then transfer the money to an equity fund. There is no additional cost involved in starting an STP. However, while most liquid funds don’t have exit loads (a charge for redeeming before a defined period), some others like liquid plus funds may have an exit load period.
It is best to finish your STP within a few transfers, say, 6-9 transfers. This is because the initial sum is limited.
To start an STP, fill the required form (which is similar to the form for an SIP). In the form, pick the target scheme, and specify the amount, number of instalments and the frequency.

Friday 11 March 2016

Real estate regulator now a reality

The bill aims to empower home buyers and make developers accountable.
infrastucture-by-shah-junaid-(21)


The upper house of the parliament on Thursday passed the long-pending Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill 2015, paving the way for setting up of regulatory bodies to monitor projects and bring transparency and accountability in real estate transactions.

The bill aims to empower home buyers, make developers accountable toward their promises and put in place mechanism to check malpractices in the sector. The law is of immense value to home buyers who have long suffered with builders changing project plans without the consent of buyers or diverting funds from one project to another. 

 “This is a major reform that promises to bring in much-needed transparency and accountability to the rather opaque sector. It will create a much-needed consumer right protection umbrella for buyers of real estate, thereby increasing consumer confidence as well as creating lasting developer brands strong on quality and timely delivery of their projects,” said Anuj Puri, chairman and country head, JLL India.





The bill’s chief objective is to set up regulatory authority on the lines of other sectors like banking and telecom and also form appellate tribunals in states and union territories. The authority will appoint abjudicating officers to settle disputes, which will be taken up by the appellate tribunal. 
The regulator will work as a nodal agency and co-ordinate efforts regarding development of the sector with key stakeholder and the government.
Among other key features, all projects including commercial and residential starting from 500 square metres or eight apartments are to be registered with the regulator, against the earlier mandate of 1,000 square metres or 12 apartments. It will be applicable retrospectively across ongoing projects too. 
However, in a discussion on the bill in the parliament, Union Urban Development Minister Venkaiah Naidu said clarity is yet to emerge if the current framework will be applicable on ongoing projects as well. He also said state governments have the flexibility to lower the project size threshold for mandatory registration. 
All real estate agents who intend to sell plot, apartment or building also have to register with the regulator. with the regulator.

With a view to promote timely completion of projects, the bill makes it compulsory for developers to keep at least 70 per cent of customer advance, including land cost in a separate escrow account, to meet construction costs. This is up from the previous requirement of 50 per cent.  

The government has also brought in parity on interest payment in case of default. Now, builders will have to pay same interest as home buyers in case of default or delays—earlier home buyers were accountable for this. It has also increased the liability of builders from two years to five years in case of structural defects.  

In case of violation of orders of the appellate tribunal, builders will be charged with three years of imprisonment while agents and buyers will have to face one year of imprisonment or monetary penalty or both. It also advocates that disputes should be resolved within 60 days.

Impact
Anshuman Magazine, chairman and managing director, CBRE South Asia Pvt Ltd, said it will have a far reaching implication for the real estate and construction sector. “It will help regulate the sector and promote transparency. If implemented in the right spirit, it could facilitate greater volumes of domestic as well as overseas investment flows into the sector. Home buyer confidence in the property market is also likely to revive.” 

Experts believe that this will go a long way in reviving the confidence of home buyers. Sales in housing market has softened over the years as end users and investors have stayed away due to high prices and unchecked construction delays in the sector. This has taken the unsold stock to an alarming level with some cities sitting on a huge pile-up of inventory.
The bill aims to boost the confidence of home buyers with more transparency and accountability from the developers.

JC Sharma, vice chairman and managing director at Sobha Ltd, said this is a step in the right direction. But he added that the bill made no mention of time-bound approvals by various central, state and local agencies, which is critical to the sector’s growth.
It is expected that developers will also benefit once the law is implemented as they can access cheaper and wider source of financing. However, on the other side, it will also gradually weed out a lot of fly-by-night and non-serious players from the market. 



Thursday 10 March 2016

PE inflows from foreign funds in real estate up 33%

Total private equity investments from foreign funds in Indian real estate increased 33%, from $1,676 million (around R11,306 crore) in 2014 to $2,220 million (around R14,974 crore) in 2015, according to latest findings of global real estate consultancy Cushman & Wakefield.


Total private equity investments from foreign funds in Indian real estate increased 33%, from $1,676 million (around R11,306 crore) in 2014 to $2,220 million (around R14,974 crore) in 2015, according to latest findings of global real estate consultancy Cushman & Wakefield.
Owing to high property prices and high investment potential, Mumbai was accounted for about 35% of the total foreign investments in 2015, followed by Delhi NCR accounting for about 25% of the investments.
Sanjay Dutt, managing director, Cushman & Wakefield India said, “The three large cities; Mumbai, Bengaluru and Delhi-NCR continue to attract the highest investments in India and account for about 75% of these investments.
However, with government initiatives to de-stress these cities, relaxed FDI norms and focus to improve infrastructure across the country, other cities in India are likely to witness rise in PE investments going forward.”
The structured debt deals accounted for almost half (49% in value terms) of the total PE investments in 2015.
The structured deals strategy, though moderated due to increased competition, offers returns in the range of 15% – 17% to its investors.

Paragon Partners launches $200-m India-focused mid-market PE fund

PE firm Paragon Partners has raised $50 million, marking the close of its $200 million growth fund, PPGF-I to invest in mid-size companies.


PPGF was established in 2015 by Siddharth Parekh and Sumeet Nindrajog. It is an AIF-Category II Private Equity fund, investing in high growth mid-market private companies in India.

The fund will focus on five key sectors — consumer discretionary, financial services, infrastructure services, industrials and healthcare services. The fund has an advanced pipeline of investment opportunities across these sectors.

Paragon Partners advisory board includes Deepak Parekh (Chairman, HDFC Ltd), Harsh Mariwala (Chairman, Marico Ltd & Founder Member), Sunil Mehta (Chairman, SPM Capital Advisors Pvt Ltd) and Jeff Serota (ex Sr. Partner at Ares Private Equity).

Siddharth Parekh, co-founder, Paragon Partners said: “We believe the next decade in India will see a strong resurgence of growth in key sectors such as manufacturing, financial services and infrastructure.”
The company said with its first close, PPGF-I has completed the funding of its first investment in Capacite Infraprojects Ltd, a leading EPC player based in Mumbai. Capacite is engaged in the construction of buildings (including super high rise structures) and factories, for large real estate developers, corporates and institutions.

The company currently has a footprint across Mumbai, NCR and Bengaluru regions and will look to grow this on a selective basis. Capacite is promoted by Rahul Katyal, Rohit Katyal and Subir Malhotra.

PPGF-I has seen significant interest from onshore and offshore institutions, family offices and HNIs. Domestic investors include India Infoline, Edelweiss Group and Infina Finance Private Ltd (an associate of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd).

Tuesday 8 March 2016

Sebi may peg M&A ‘control’ cap at 25%

Regulator’s move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies confront during takeovers

Mumbai: The market regulator is set to clarify what the term ‘control’ means in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by pegging the shareholding threshold of an acquirer at 25%, two persons familiar with the development said.
The move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies currently confront during takeovers, one of the two persons said, requesting anonymity.
Currently, the definition of ‘control’ under the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) Regulations, 2011—popularly known as the Takeover Code—doesn’t specify a threshold for shareholding.
“The numerical threshold for determining control is a globally accepted norm and should be the prescribed criteria along with the other factors which may signify control,” said Tejesh Chitlangi, a partner at law firm IC Legal.
The current takeover code states that an acquirer is in ‘control’ only if the board of the company that’s being acquired gives the former the right to appoint a majority of the directors, and have the final say on management and policy decisions.
The control of management or policy decisions is through shareholding or management rights or shareholders’ agreement or voting agreements.
“The Securities and Exchange Board of India board will clear a discussion paper on Saturday, which proposes to peg the numeric threshold of voting rights (shareholding) at 25% and giving protective rights to the acquirer,” said the second person, who also declined to be named.
A Sebi spokesperson did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.
According to the discussion paper, there could be a framework for protective rights with an exhaustive list of rights that do not lead to acquisition of control.
These protective rights would be granted to the acquirer if they are cleared by 51% of the minority public shareholders.
“While it will be important to have a list which considers the commercial realities of merger and acquisition transactions, it may be a practically onerous task to have an exhaustive list that captures all the exempted protective rights and Sebi may need to grant an exemption on case-to-case basis,” the second person said.
According to Lalit Kumar, partner at J. Sagar Associates, there is currently no clarity on whether or not protective (veto) rights to investors will lead to control.
“This issue came up in the matter of Subhkam Ventures where Sebi held that protective rights lead to control. However, in appeal to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), SAT held that protective rights only lead to negative control and not positive control,” Kumar said.
“The matter went in appeal to the Supreme Court, which did not pass any order on this issue but said that SAT’s order will not act as a precedent. Therefore, presently, there is no decided case on this issue although the general view is that protective rights do not lead to control,” he explained.
Kumar’s reference is to private equity investor Subhkam’s 17.9% stake in MSK Projects. In 2007, when it bought the stake, Subhkam sought and received several so-called negative rights (such as the power of veto on key decisions). In 2008, Sebi ruled that this constituted control. On appeal, SAT ruled in favour of Subhkam. Sebi appealed the case in the Supreme Court which dismissed the case. However, because it said SAT’s order would not be a precedent, private equity investors are still not sure as to whether negative rights such as the one Subhkam had constitute control (such rights are common in agreements between promoters and private equity firms).
Some in the legal fraternity say the definition of control cannot be set in stone.
“The question of control is a nuanced one primarily of fact and secondly of law… Anything set in stone on defining control would lead to false positives and negatives. Sebi should adopt a more nuanced approach and go by court rulings as precedents,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors.
Sebi first started reviewing the definition of control in 2014. Finalizing a proposed framework took longer than expected, nearly 20 months, in wake of the number of suggestions.
Sebi decided to re-examine the definition of control following the 2013 acquisition of a 24% stake in Jet Airways (India) Ltd by Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways PJSC for Rs.2,058 crore.
In May 2014, Sebi ruled that the deal did not attract the provisions of the Takeover Code, as it found a lack of substantial controlling powers with Etihad after the transaction.

Apollo Tyres enters two-wheeler segment with Acti series

To invest Rs. 4,000 cr on capacity expansion at Chennai centre.



Apollo Tyres has entered the two-wheeler segment with the launch of the ‘Acti’ series.

One of the leading tyre makers in the country, the company also said that it will invest Rs. 4,000 crore in the next financial year to expand its bus, truck tyres in Chennai.

Designed and developed at the company's global R&D centre in Chennai, the Apollo Acti series for bikes and scooters would cover nearly 85 per cent of the replacement market for two-wheeler tyres in India, the company said on Monday.

“The presence in the two-wheeler segment will help the company cement its leadership position in India. The Apollo Acti series will provide the best value proposition to our customers along with an enjoyable driving experience,” Onkar S Kanwar, Chairman, said here at the launch.

The two-wheeler category, which is growing at a CAGR of 8.5 per cent in India, holds huge potential for tyre manufacturers, the company said.

The company said it is looking at selling 1.20 lakh tyres each month initially, going up to five lakh tyres each month in the next two years. However, the company is sourcing the tyres from one of its vendors in Chennai and will decide on setting up a new plant or investment for two-wheeler tyres in the future.

“It depends on demand and branding of the tyres. We will be outsourcing the tyres for the next two years and we will decide on a greenfield or brownfield when the time comes,” Neeraj Kanwar, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, told reporters.

To expand its existing tyre plants and capacities, Kanwar said Apollo will invest $600 million (around Rs.4,000 crore) next financial year to enhance capacity at its plants in India (Chennai) and abroad (Hungary).

He added that the company is also in the process of doubling the capacity of its Chennai plant to 12,000 truck and bus radials a day from 6,000 earlier.

The company’s shares closed at Rs. 170.35 on the BSE on Monday, up 2.65 per cent from the previous close.


Developers in a consortium to be treated as separate tax units

This will enable these companies to set off losses from other projects and not attract the highest income tax rate.


In a major relief to infrastructure developers, the income tax department has clarified that companies which are part of a consortium in large infrastructure projects will be treated as separate taxable units.
This will enable these companies to set off losses from other projects and not attract the highest income tax rate.
In a clarification, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has now allowed the companies to be identified individually rather than as one taxable unit known as ‘association of persons’ or AOP.
Typically, consortiums are formed to implement large infrastructure projects in engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contracts as well as turnkey projects.
The income tax department considered a consortium to be one separate entity for tax purposes while the companies’ preferred to be treated individually. This led to many tax disputes, which the tax department has now sought to address.
Pointing out that there are differing court verdicts on what constitutes an AOP, the tax department said that with a view to avoiding tax disputes and to have consistency in approach, it has been decided that consortium arrangements may not be treated as AOP, provided that each member of the consortium is independently responsible for implementing its share of work, earns a profit or loss for that work and has its own personnel.
Another criterion is that the control and management of the consortium is not unified.
“Large turnkey infrastructure projects are executed by consortiums of construction companies through EPC contracts. There are certain cases where the tax authorities have taxed all the consortium members as one taxable unit, that is as an AOP. This leads to a number of issues like being taxed at the maximum marginal rate, inability to set off losses of other projects, non-availability of tax credit for non-residents, etc,” said Hemal Zobalia, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells Llp, in a note.
“These issues bring in uncertainty and increase the overall tax cost. CBDT has sought to clarify the taxation of such EPC consortiums through this circular,” Zobalia added.
He said that the circular reiterates some of the principles which were already laid down by judicial precedents.
“However, this may not help in resolving all the issues surrounding AOPs as a lot is left to the discretion of the tax officer and the facts and circumstances of each case,” he added.
The move is also expected to attract more foreign investors to invest in infrastructure projects.
Akhil Sambhar, tax partner at EY, called it a positive move from the government.
“It is important for big projects like oil and gas where most of the work is done in a consortium. Any large project, be it power, metro or oil and gas, the magnitude of work is so much that the work needs multiple players. And with no clarity on taxes, it was leading to a large number of tax disputes,” he said.
“With this circular coming in, it will definitely encourage more foreign companies to come to India. In fact, it was a key issue for foreign companies working on EPC projects,” Sambhar added.

Friday 4 March 2016

Piramal Realty plans to invest Rs 16,000 cr in 4 years

Piramal said that the company is looking to increase its commerical portfolio as well in the coming years.



Piramal Realty, the real estate arm of Ajay Piramal-owned Piramal Group, plans to invest Rs 16,000 crore in development of real estate projects and acquisition of land, over the next 4 years.
Anand Piramal, executive director, Piramal Group told FE that while the company already has a roughly 9 million square feet of residential projects pipeline to be executed till 2020, the company is open to acquiring fresh parcels of land and distressed assets.
The company is also in the midst of developing an office project in Kurla, near Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) ad-measuring 2.5 million square feet.
The company launched a luxury project at Byculla called Piramal Aranya, which will entail an investment of R4,300 crore over the lifecycle of the project.
The sea-facing 70-storey high rise residential project will be spread across 7 acres and is in close proximity to the 60 acre botanical gardens on the west.
In 2015, Goldman Sachs and Waurburg Pincus had invested a total of $434 million in Piramal Realty, giving the company a strong bandwidth to invest in real estate projects.
Piramal said that the company is looking to increase its commerical portfolio as well in the coming years. “As of now we just have one project, but going forward we would like to have a combination of both residential and commercial real estate.
With the expectation of 7%-8% growth in the Indian economy, the focus on commercial real estate will come back and we would like to have a healthy mix of both segments”.

Sun Capital

10 Tips for the Successful Long-Term Investor

While it may be true that in the stock market there is no rule without an exception, there are some principles that are tough to dispute. Let's review 10 general principles to help investors get a better grasp of how to approach the market from a long-term view. Every point embodies some fundamental concept every investor should know.



1. Sell the Losers and Let the Winners Ride!

Time and time again, investors take profits by selling their appreciated investments, but they hold onto stocks that have declined in the hope of a rebound. If an investor doesn't know when it's time to let go of hopeless stocks, he or she can, in the worst-case scenario, see the stock sink to the point where it is almost worthless. Of course, the idea of holding onto high-quality investments while selling the poor ones is great in theory, but hard to put into practice. The following information might help:
  • Riding a Winner - Peter Lynch was famous for talking about "tenbaggers", or investments that increased tenfold in value. The theory is that much of his overall success was due to a small number of stocks in his portfolio that returned big. If you have a personal policy to sell after a stock has increased by a certain multiple - say three, for instance - you may never fully ride out a winner. No one in the history of investing with a "sell-after-I-have-tripled-my-money" mentality has ever had a tenbagger. Don't underestimate a stock that is performing well by sticking to some rigid personal rule - if you don't have a good understanding of the potential of your investments, your personal rules may end up being arbitrary and too limiting.

  • Selling a Loser - There is no guarantee that a stock will bounce back after a protracted decline. While it's important not to underestimate good stocks, it's equally important to be realistic about investments that are performing badly. Recognizing your losers is hard because it's also an acknowledgment of your mistake. But it's important to be honest when you realize that a stock is not performing as well as you expected it to. Don't be afraid to swallow your pride and move on before your losses become even greater.
In both cases, the point is to judge companies on their merits according to your research. In each situation, you still have to decide whether a price justifies future potential. Just remember not to let your fears limit your returns or inflate your losses.

2. Don't Chase a "Hot Tip."

Whether the tip comes from your brother, your cousin, your neighbor or even your broker, you shouldn't accept it as law. When you make an investment, it's important you know the reasons for doing so; do your own research and analysis of any company before you even consider investing your hard-earned money. Relying on a tidbit of information from someone else is not only an attempt at taking the easy way out, it's also a type of gambling. Sure, with some luck, tips sometimes pan out. But they will never make you an informed investor, which is what you need to be to be successful in the long run.

3. Don't Sweat the Small Stuff.
As a long-term investor, you shouldn't panic when your investments experience short-term movements. When tracking the activities of your investments, you should look at the big picture. Remember to be confident in the quality of your investments rather than nervous about the inevitable volatility of the short term. Also, don't overemphasize the few cents difference you might save from using a limit versus market order.
Granted, active traders will use these day-to-day and even minute-to-minute fluctuations as a way to make gains. But the gains of a long-term investor come from a completely different market movement - the one that occurs over many years - so keep your focus on developing your overall investment philosophy by educating yourself.

4. Don't Overemphasize the P/E Ratio.

Investors often place too much importance on the price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio). Because it is one key tool among many, using only this ratio to make buy or sell decisions is dangerous and ill-advised. The P/E ratio must be interpreted within a context, and it should be used in conjunction with other analytical processes. So, a low P/E ratio doesn't necessarily mean a security is undervalued, nor does a high P/E ratio necessarily mean a company is overvalued.


5. Resist the Lure of Penny Stocks.

A common misconception is that there is less to lose in buying a low-priced stock. But whether you buy a $5 stock that plunges to $0 or a $75 stock that does the same, either way you've lost 100% of your initial investment. A lousy $5 company has just as much downside risk as a lousy $75 company. In fact, a penny stock is probably riskier than a company with a higher share price, which would have more regulations placed on it.


6. Pick a Strategy and Stick With It.

Different people use different methods to pick stocks and fulfill investing goals. There are many ways to be successful and no one strategy is inherently better than any other. However, once you find your style, stick with it. An investor who flounders between different stock-picking strategies will probably experience the worst, rather than the best, of each. Constantly switching strategies effectively makes you a market timer, and this is definitely territory most investors should avoid. Take Warren Buffett's actions during the dotcom boom of the late '90s as an example. Buffett's value-oriented strategy had worked for him for decades, and - despite criticism from the media - it prevented him from getting sucked into tech startups that had no earnings and eventually crashed.


7. Focus on the Future.

The tough part about investing is that we are trying to make informed decisions based on things that have yet to happen. It's important to keep in mind that even though we use past data as an indication of things to come, it's what happens in the future that matters most.
A quote from Peter Lynch's book "One Up on Wall Street" (1990) about his experience with Subaru demonstrates this: "If I'd bothered to ask myself, 'How can this stock go any higher?' I would have never bought Subaru after it already went up twenty-fold. But I checked the fundamentals, realized that Subaru was still cheap, bought the stock, and made seven-fold after that." The point is to base a decision on future potential rather than on what has already happened in the past.

8. Adopt a Long-Term Perspective.

Large short-term profits can often entice those who are new to the market. But adopting a long-term horizon and dismissing the "get in, get out and make a killing" mentality is a must for any investor. This doesn't mean that it's impossible to make money by actively trading in the short term. But, as we already mentioned, investing and trading are very different ways of making gains from the market. Trading involves very different risks that buy-and-hold investors don't experience. As such, active trading requires certain specialized skills.

Neither investing style is necessarily better than the other - both have their pros and cons. But active trading can be wrong for someone without the appropriate time, financial resources, education and desire.


9. Be Open-Minded.

Many great companies are household names, but many good investments are not household names. Thousands of smaller companies have the potential to turn into the large blue chips of tomorrow. In fact, historically, small-caps have had greater returns than large-caps; over the decades from 1926-2001, small-cap stocks in the U.S. returned an average of 12.27% while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) returned 10.53%.

This is not to suggest that you should devote your entire portfolio to small-cap stocks. Rather, understand that there are many great companies beyond those in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), and that by neglecting all these lesser-known companies, you could also be neglecting some of the biggest gains.

10. Be Concerned About Taxes, but Don't Worry.

Putting taxes above all else is a dangerous strategy, as it can often cause investors to make poor, misguided decisions. Yes, tax implications are important, but they are a secondary concern. The primary goals in investing are to grow and secure your money. You should always attempt to minimize the amount of tax you pay and maximize your after-tax return, but the situations are rare where you'll want to put tax considerations above all else when making an investment decision.


The Bottom Line

There are exceptions to every rule, but we hope that these solid tips for long-term investors and the common-sense principles we've discussed benefit you overall and provide some insight into how you should think about investing. If you are looking for more information about long term investing, Investopedia's Ask an Advisor tackles the topic by answering one of our user questions.

Sun Capital

Thursday 3 March 2016

Jewellery sector contributes to black money: CBEC chief

Despite the ongoing jewellers' strike to protest against reimposition of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery, CBEC today said the sector contributes to generation of black money and needs to be brought under the tax ambit.

Sun capital


"We have brought jewellery (sector) into the tax net. This is the levy which we had attempted two years ago and withdrawn... This is the sector which you will agree with me needs to be brought into tax needs," Chairman of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), Najib Shah today said at an event organised by industry body Assocham.

"This is a sector which lends itself to generation of unaccounted wealth." Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the Budget for 2016-17 had proposed 1 percent excise duty on jewellery without input credit or 12.5 percent with input tax credit on jewellery excluding silver other than studded with diamonds and some other precious stones.

Jewellers are on a three-day pan-India strike to protest against the proposed re-introduction of 1 percent excise duty on gold and diamond jewellery and mandatory quoting of PAN by consumers for transaction of Rs 2 lakh and above.

Shah noted: "... manufacturing sector contributes 17 percent of GDP. We have a huge chunk of industry which is out of the tax net." The CBEC chairman said the revenue department will take a hit of Rs 1,000 crore due to the change in CENVAT credit rules.

"But we thought it is essential because the cost of litigation for you and me are much more than revenue which otherwise we have got," he said.

Noting that the government has increased some duties, Shah said it's done so to create a level-playing field for Indian industries as was the case in defence.

He urged industries to stop demanding exemptions to avail of goods and services tax (GST).

"If you want GST, you should not demand exemptions because two don't go together," Shah said.
 

Dilip Buildcon bags Rs 545.4-cr contract in Goa

MUMBAI: Engineering firm Dilip Buildcon today said it has bagged Rs 545.4-crore contract from the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to construct 640-km eight-lane cable-stayed bridge across the Zuari in Goa. 


The Bhopal-based company has partnered with Ukrainian firm Mostobudivelnyi Zahin (MBZ) for its technical expertise to construct the cable bridge, a statement here said. 

Dilip Buildcon will have a majority stake of 70 per cent in the joint venture firm while the remaining 30 per cent will be held by MBZ, it said. 

"This is our first project in Goa, and we hope to complete the project before time. Mostobudivelnyi Zahin, which has a vast experience in construction of cable suspension bridges, will be our technology partner," Dilip Buildcon Executive Director and CEO Devendra Jain said. 

This contract is part of the Rs 676.19-crore, 1.084-km-long project, which is expected to be completed in 36 months. 

"There are around 4-5 cable suspension bridges built on a large scale in India, and this would be the second-largest cable bridge length-wise in the country, after Vidyasagar Setu in Kolkata. With this contract, we are now present in 12 states," he said.

GE to sell India financial services biz to Aion, former execs

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. 



General Electric Co said it would sell its India commercial lending and leasing businesses to a consortium of former GE Capital executives and Aion Capital Partners as it looks to trim itself and focus on its industrial businesses. 

The transaction represents about USD 400 million in ending net investment and includes businesses such as auto leasing, healthcare financing and corporate lending and leasing. Employees would also be transferred to the buyer, the company said. 

Aion has partnered with former GE Capital executives Pramod Bhasin and Anil Chawla for the acquisition. Bhasin was formerly the head of GE Capital in India and Asia. Chawla was the head of the commercial business operations of GE Capital India. 

Aion is a joint venture between ICICI Venture and Apollo Global Management.

Sun Capital Services

India on course for recovery: IMF report

Pegs GDP growth at 7.5% for FY17; expects private investmentto pick up

In a thumbs-up to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s financial management, the International Monetary Fund has said that the Indian economy is on the path to recovery, helped by low crude oil prices, improving current account and fiscal deficits, as well as a sharp fall in inflation.

Indian Economy


However, in its India: 2016 Article IV Consultation report, the IMF has pegged the country’s growth rate at 7.3 per cent this fiscal and 7.5 per cent for the next. This is marginally lower than Jaitley’s official estimate of 7.6 per cent GDP growth in 2015-16 and 7-7.75 per cent in 2016-17.

“The Indian economy is on a recovery path, helped by a large terms of trade gain (about 2.5 per cent of GDP), positive policy actions, and reduced external vulnerabilities,” said the report, which is based on the IMF’s consultations with officials from the Finance Ministry and the Reserve Bank of India.

With some uptick in industrial activity, the Washington-based international lender also expects a pick-up in private investment to help broaden the economic recovery.
The report has, however, warned that a number of economic risks remain. On the external front, it has highlighted a possible disruption from increased volatility in global markets, unexpected developments in US monetary policy and China’s slowdown.

On the domestic front, the IMF has listed the weakness in corporate financial positions and bad loans of banks, as well as the delay in reforms as risks that could weigh on growth, accelerate inflation and undermine sentiment.

“On the upside, further structural reforms could lead to stronger growth, as would a sustained period of low global energy prices,” it said.
The report also stressed the need for continued vigilance, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, and sustained reforms to enhance the resilience of the economy and bolster potential growth.

Essential reforms
It said reform priorities include removing supply-side bottlenecks, especially in the agricultural and power sectors, and facilitating land acquisition. “Further reforms are also essential to boost employment in the formal sector, encourage female labour force participation, and enhance labour market flexibility more broadly,” said the IMF.

The report welcomed the adoption of flexible inflation targeting and the progress in enhancing monetary policy transmission, and said the RBI should be ready to tighten the monetary stance, if required, to control inflation.

Share it!